Got some numbers this morning from SisSoftware Sandra.
It appears (but I really don't know) that the OS is running using one only of the two multithreading CPUs.
< Processor >
Model: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520 @ 1.33GHz
Speed: 1.33GHz
Peak Processing Performance (P:2.66GFLOPS)
Adjusted Peak Performance (APP:798WM
Cores per Processor: 1 Unit(s)
Threads per Core: 1 Unit(s)
Type: Tablet/MID
Integrated Data Cache: 24kB, Synchronous, Write-Thru, 6-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing
L2 Cache: 512kB, ECC, Synchronous, ATC, 8-way, 64 byte line size, 2 threads sharing
Warning 234: Hyper-Threading disabled or OS does not support all HT CPUs. Check configuration.
< Detailed Benchmark Results >
Buffered Read: 27.17MB/s
Sequential Read: 27.82MB/s
Random Read: 27.75MB/s
Buffered Write: 6.16MB/s
Sequential Write: 10MB/s
Random Write: 6.12MB/s
Random Access Time: 101µs
< Performance Test Status >
Result ID: KingSpecKSD-USB.1-008MJ 8GB (USB)
I've attached a couple of pictures. One is of the Joggler. Notice that the graphs only show 1 CPU. The other picture is of an Atom D510. Noticed it shows 4 CPUs (the D510 is a dual core dual multhreading CPU.
Attachments
- Pete
O2 Jogglers running EFI Ubuntu / Squeezeplayer
OpenPeak Voip Telephony / Zigbee tabletops hardware modded with Seabios / RTC / Ethernet ROM edits / SSD drives running XPe for automation screens
Never really looked into HT before, but seems as though the joggler may be better off without it:
This is what Intel calls hyperthreading (also called simultaneous multithreading). For example, the Intel Core i7 processor with four cores can run eight threads simultaneously - two in each core. Apparently, the more threads you can run simultaneously the more work you get done in a given time. But there is a problem here: The two threads running in the same core are competing for the same resources. If each of the two threads gets only half the amount of a limiting resource then it will run at half speed, and the advantage of hyperthreading is completely gone. Two threads running at half speed is certainly not better than a single thread running at full speed.
Will still look at getting this fixed though!
Fullscreen squeezeplay windows, server 2003, foshiz mini v1 and v2, (and a few broken builds) :P so far.....
more to come!!
I have a W2003 standard server set up with a newer Atom D510 (pics above) and while I see the 2 cores and 4 threads; most of the work most of the time shifts over to one of the two cores.
I'm running CPU-Z on that one. It ran really fast; in less than 10 seconds; on the Joggler it took over a minute.
Attachments
Last edited by pete on Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Pete
O2 Jogglers running EFI Ubuntu / Squeezeplayer
OpenPeak Voip Telephony / Zigbee tabletops hardware modded with Seabios / RTC / Ethernet ROM edits / SSD drives running XPe for automation screens
Yeah i see the thinking behind one physical thread and one virtual thread,
But in a limited environment like the joggler this may just work out for the better,
So all of the screens above are from xp?
Fullscreen squeezeplay windows, server 2003, foshiz mini v1 and v2, (and a few broken builds) :P so far.....
more to come!!
2 - Unzip the file you downloaded from Gateway
3 - Download the attached INI file and replace the one with the same name in the Gateway configuration.
4 - remove your old driver and install this newly modified driver.
How are you guys copying the img file to a pendrive? when i try using the same method as the linux releases (using win32 disk imager) it simply says "done" when trying to write but nothing actually copies and the original (android) partitioning is still there. This happens with both the xp and 2003 releases but no others.
or should i be making a manual partition and extracting the img file to the pendrive?
Anyway, thanks for the release. Is there a donation email address i can send you a few quid?
Yes; Dan should set up a donation email address; how about it Dan!
I've done it a few ways. Win32 disk manager errors out sometimes for me. I use USB Image tool. I also have done the manual thing with linux using GParted. The first image posted for XP was a bit bigger than my 4Gb drive so I wrote it to an 8Gb drive and used GParted to shrink it down such that it would fit on my 4Gb drive. You can too make the USB stick have the appearance of a disk drive and see both fat32 and NTFS partitions on your PC.
The W2003 release has more "bells and whistles" than the XP release and does a better job of memory management making it quicker.
- Pete
O2 Jogglers running EFI Ubuntu / Squeezeplayer
OpenPeak Voip Telephony / Zigbee tabletops hardware modded with Seabios / RTC / Ethernet ROM edits / SSD drives running XPe for automation screens